Tuesday, November 18, 2008

Putting Humpty Dumpty Back Together Again

I recently inherited a camera from my Dad with the intent of experimenting a little bit with film. The camera is a late-1970s Konica AutoReflex TC and I've put a few rolls through the camera with encouraging results. Recently, however, I noticed strange behavior of the light meter and decided to investigate...The problem seemed to stem from a sticky aperture lever on one of the lenses, a Konica Hexanon 50mm f/1.7. Upon closer inspection, the sticky aperture was caused by the common problem of oil/grease on the blades. Rather than fork out cash to have the lens professionally cleaned, I figured I'd tackle it myself; after all, this lens is under $20 to replace!

look at all of that (shiny) oil on the blades!

Having successfully disassembled, cleaned, and reassembled the lens, I thought I'd create a little how-to. In my search for information on this problem, I found many (albeit pretty vague) lens disassembly guides, but was unable to find any Konica-specific information.

Tools:
  • Lens spanner wrenches - these are a camera-specific tool, but in a pinch, a lens cap with rubber/tape under it, or a screwdriver/punch will work. I've even heard of using plastic pill bottles or cups.
  • Jewler's screwdrivers - a small set of slotted and phillips screwdrivers to work with the several small screws involved here
  • lighter fluid & q-tips - this will be used for cleaning the aperture blades once we have the lens open
  • lens cleaning fluid/lens pen - for cleaning lens elements
  • rocket blower
  • soft cloth/shirt - I used this to handle the individual lens elements
Instructions:

Start by un-mounting the lens, removing the front and rear caps, and any filters on the front of the lens. Prepare your work surface - making sure your tools are nearby and there's plenty of light and space to work.

With that out of the way, begin the disassembly by removing the 4 screws that attach the lens mount to the back of the lens. Be careful when removing the mount as the aperture ring will come with it and there's a small ball under the aperture ring may fall out. If you lose this ball, you'll lose the nice detents at each aperture setting on the aperture ring.

The 2 set screws in the image above are from the removal of the fixed ring between the distance scale and aperture ring. It is not necessary to remove this piece for this operation. Here is what the lens should now look like:

See those 2 notches in the stepped-ring around the rear lens element? Those are where you need to insert your spanner wrench and unscrew the ring. I was able to apply gentle pressure with a small screwdriver tip to loosen the ring, finishing it by hand. BE CAREFUL NOT TO SCRATCH THE GLASS WITH YOUR TOOLS!!!

With the retaining ring now off, carefully use the shirt/soft cloth and flip the lens over onto it. The rear element, a spacer ring, and the next-rearmost element should fall out onto the cloth. You now have direct access to the back side of the aperture blades!



Now that the rear of the lens is all set, it's time to tackle the front. Begin by using the spanner wrench or punch/screwdriver method again to loosen the nameplate ring (see those 2 little notches again?) on the front. Be extra careful with this piece as it's only plastic and likely breaks easily!

With the nameplate ring removed, you should see 3 set screws that it covered up. Remove these with a small screwdriver. Grasping the front lens ring in 1 hand and the rest of the lens in the other, unscrew the front ring from the rest of the lens body.

This now gives you access to a third ring which holds the front lens element in (finally!). Use the spanner wrenches/screwdriver/punch to spin this ring off as well (mine was loose enough where I could take it off entirely by hand). Be careful removing this ring as it holds 2 lens elements and a spacer below it! Using your soft cloth again, flip the lens upside down onto the cloth, releasing the spacer and the 2 frontmost lens elements.


Now it's time to tackle the 5th and final lens element, which is bonded to the silver ring shown in the above image. This ring was on particularly tight in my lens, so the screwdriver/punch method didn't work. For this, I resorted to cutting out 3/4" strips of rubber band and placing them on the rim of the silver ring. I then used the lens' rear cap to apply downward pressure onto the rubber and twist the ring off. Here's a shot of that procedure:


With this last remaining lens element removed, you now have total access to both the front and back surfaces of the aperture blades.

To remove any grease or oil on the blades, use q-tips lightly wetted with lighter fluid (or so I've heard...more on this in a minute) and swab and dry the blades thoroughly, cycling through the range of available apertures with the aperture lever. I used acetone to clean mine and it worked, but tarnished/ate some of the surrounding paint in the process. I've read mixed opinions on whether the aperture blades should be lubricated with graphite after cleaning. I left mine bare and the lens functions fine, so I don't feel it's necessary, but feel free to do so if you wish!

And as they say, installation is the reverse order of removal! Good luck!

Monday, November 3, 2008

Lempster, NH Wind Farm

The big news in my parent's neck of the woods (quite literally, actually) is the wind farm which recently went online in Lempster, NH. This project has made headlines around New Hampshire for the past several months as construction wound down and the power generation went live. I was up visiting my family recently and had the opportunity to drive through the area surrounding the farm with a local tour guide (my Dad). Here are a few of the photos I took:







Pretty neat eh?

If you'd like more information about the project, here are a few links:
http://www.nhpr.org/node/18091
http://www.wmur.com/money/17646467/detail.html?rss=man&psp=news
http://whispersinthewind.wordpress.com/2008/10/07/lempster-nh-wind-farm/

There was a great informative site located at www.lempsterwind.com, but it looks like the site now redirects to the wind farm developer's (Iberdola Renewables) website.

Thursday, September 4, 2008

Google Chrome

So it seems everyone has something to say about Google's new web browser, called Chrome. For evidence, just look at the articles from the last 3 days on Slashdot -- I count at least 5 articles on the browser.

Like all the others, I could write up a full feature report showing performance metrics, speculating on browser market share and such, but enough of that -- in real-world usage, Chrome is the most responsive web browser I've used, but I'll leave the performance evaluations to others. What I did want to mention, however, are some features I miss from Firefox after using Chrome for 3 full days:
  • Chrome was rumored to handle Firefox plugins, but no extension support has been implemented yet. I miss ForecastFox!
  • I miss the automatic search-as-you-type option from Firefox. I also miss being able to use the "enter" key to activate highligted links (as FF provides). An example is to open NASIOC, type "NESIC", hit "enter" and bam! the New England Subaru section is loaded faster than you could scroll down and click on it. It is neat, however, how Chrome finds all instances of your search text on the page at once and highlights the out-of-focus instances in pale yellow with the in-focus instance highlighted in bold orange.
  • Where's the "undo close last tab" button? I know each tab is it's own process and yadda yadda, but this is a pretty useful feature for those "OH NO I JUST CLOSED THAT TAB!" moments.
  • The interface seems pretty cramped - with the address bar doubling as a search bar and the bookmarks bar being a well-hidden option. I don't mind the lack of buttons on the toolbar, as I've replaced most of them with mouse or keyboard shortcut keys, but options to enable some traditional browser buttons and boxes would be nice.
  • Where's the Title Bar?!
  • I'd like a customizable home page - showing the 9 most frequently visited pages is nice, but it would be neat to add a search box for my favorite search engine (rather than just a search box for your browsing history) and maybe embed my google calendar or something in it. I know Google has their Homepage for that, but I find it cluttered and like the layout of the Chrome homepage better.
  • There's no support for "live bookmarks" using RSS feeds - I miss the RSS button in the address bar the Firefox provides.
  • I've seen this mentioned elsewhere, but Chrome also doesn't support "smooth scrolling" which is very annoying when trying to scan long webpages (such as blogs).
I'm sure there are more that I'm forgetting, so I'll probably add to this list as I come up with more.

As one Slashdot commenter suggested, this seems like a ploy for Google not to take over the market share with their browser, but rather to provide a solid example of a different style of web browser with open source code so that others can adopt some of the niceties it provides (simple interface, excellent JavaScript performance, self-contained tabs, etc...). This is of course advantageous to Google as nearly all of their products and services are web-based, so the better ALL browers are, the better their software will run. With this in mind, I'm not sure Google will care to develop Chrome much further along usability lines - I see it more as a proof-of-concept to showcase some of the major features Google thought browers should have.

Chrome's also only been out for 3 days, so perhaps jumping to such conclusions is a little premature. I guess we'll just have to take Chrome as it is for now and see where Google decides to take it. 

Tuesday, July 8, 2008

Pandora Radio & It's Clever Advertising

Ever since hearing about it from a friend over a year ago, I've been using Pandora Radio to help me pass the day at work. It's been working fine for the most part, but I recently created a new radio station and uncovered one of the secrets of Pandora's box. For this to make sense, however, we need a little background about Pandora Radio for the unacquainted.

Pandora is a music site where users can create their own internet radio stations based on a seed song or band. Pandora then chooses songs based around several dozen metrics about the seed music. It then plays song after song of music it thinks is similar to the seed. You can then further refine the choices Pandora makes by "thumbs upping" and "thumbs downing" individual songs.

As with most things on the internet, Pandora Radio appears to run off advertising. Every time users interact with the site, whether to setup new stations, bookmark favorite songs, or refine Pandora's chosen songs for a particular station, the site's advertisements on the right side update. This is a clever way to update the ads only when you know the user is interacting with the site and thus able to view the changing ads. More on this later.

With all of this in mind, the station I recently created uses the progressive-rock(?) band "Tool" as one of the seeds. I've been rating songs on the station for about a week now and have noticed an obvious pattern begin to develop. Several times a day (once an hour?), the station will start to drift away from Tool-esque music and into very very incorrect choices. Recent examples include Clay Aiken, "Solid Love" by Paul Brady, and "Mr. Lonesome" by Tompaul Glaser. Songs can't get any farther from Tool than these.

At first I just chalked these erroneous selections up to flukes of Pandora's algorithm, but now I see it as a clever way to boost ad revenue. Since ads change when the user interacts with the website, these blatantly wrong song picks force the user (who presumably is listening*) to click back over to the Pandora Radio website and "thumbs-down" the song or advance to the next one (unless the user can tolerate hearing music that's the polar-opposite of what should be playing). Every time I've done this, the next song is one I've "thumbed-up" before or at the least, is right in line with what the station should be picking for music.

Rather than these bad suggestions being mistakes, they actually seem to be a clever mechanism to force users to interact with the website. Since site interactions cause the ads on Pandora Radio to cycle (generally), this is just a clever method of increasing the number of ad views Pandora generates for its advertising clients.

Neat as it may be, it can get pretty annoying from a user's perspective. So far it hasn't been too bad though, so we'll see; if it gets too intrusive, I might switch back to listening to my MP3 collection at work.

-----
*there's also an inactivity timeout to determine when the user is no longer listening

Tuesday, June 24, 2008

Make Way For Pioneer Elite - Update

The home theater setup is finally complete. It's taken a few weeks to get all of the little pieces put together, but it's done and sounds/looks fantastic. I'm really impressed with the new receiver - the audio quality from the Pioneer is unbelievable - such a rich full-bodied sound; a stark contrast to the flat uninspiring sound from the older Sony which it replaced.

The wiring came out nice and neat too, with only 1 (HDMI) cable running to the TV due to the receiver's 1080p upconversion:


The final piece of the setup was the cooling system. As I mentioned in my previous post, the receiver fit very tight in the opening I had for it. I ended up removing all 4 feet and replacing them with hard plastic stick-on feet instead. This prohibits me from opening the front panel cover without pulling the receiver out further, but it's the only way it fits. Even with the slim feet, there's only about a ¼" gap above the receiver; a far cry from the 8" of ventilation Pioneer recommends for the receiver.

To help cool the receiver better, I decided to make an active cooling system using 2 PC case fans. The TV cabinet wasn't originally made with this in mind, so it required some slight modifications; namely 2-3½" holes in the shelf above the receiver. This shelf is what the center channel speaker sits on, so the fans are concealed behind it when everything's installed.

First the top had to be removed; fortunately it's held on by about 27 screws from underneath rather than glued. It still took a little persuasion with a dead-blow hammer though as the finish had bonded it to the case. Here's a shot with the top removed:


With the top off, access to the top-middle shelf (where the orange screwdriver in the above picture is resting) was possible. The next step was to drill the 2 big holes between the middle and rear horizontal support straps for the top. 8 more small holes would follow to accommodate 4 mounting screws for each fan. Here is large hole #2 being drilled:


A backer-board was used underneath the shelf (that's what the clamps in the picture are supporting) to prevent wood chipping when the hole saw poked through the shelf.

Once all the holes were drilled the two fans were mounted. I found two ultra-quiet 92mm case fans from Silicon Valley Compucycle. The fans are made by SilenX and flow 32CFM at 11dBA. These fans are wired in parallel, fused, and connected to a 12v AC adapter which in turn, is plugged into the switched outlet on the back of the receiver. This means the fans turn on and off with the receiver!


The fans can be faintly heard above ambient room noise with all audio source equipment off. Upon turning the TV on, however (still no audio, just TV picture), the noise of the fans quickly blend in with the quiet hum of the TV's internal cooling fan. I'd say 11dBA is about the loudest I'd want to go for home theater fans. With the audio equipment turned on, however, the fan noise disappears. I don't feel these audibly affect the noise floor of my system, but if I want to make them even quieter, I bet mounting them on 4 rubber/nylon washers. This would help damp out any vibrations occurring from the fans being directly mounted to a hard wood surface.

I don't have any data to confirm that the fans actually do cool the receiver effectively, but perhaps if I get ahold of a thermometer, I can do some tests with and without the fans to see how much of a difference they make. Until then, I think this setup will be just fine - the receiver doesn't seem unusually hot and hasn't entered thermal protection mode at all. So far, I'm very pleased with the new setup!

Tuesday, May 27, 2008

Make Way For Pioneer Elite

I am (was, now, actually) in need of a new A/V receiver. The one I currently own makes (as anyone who's watched a movie at my house can attest to) a loud obnoxious popping noise in the rear-left speaker when on Dolby Digital/DTS surround sound mode....it's a hell of a unit otherwise, but the pop is just unbearable. Also considering that receiver was purchased at the cusp of DVD players coming onto the market, nevermind high definition tv or 7-channel audio, I figured it was time for an upgrade.

After much deliberation and a bit of an impulsive buy, I'll be picking up a brand new Pioneer Elite VSX-92TXH from BestBuy on Thursday. Don't tell the sales guy at Tweeter, but BestBuy price matched Tweeter's $500-lower sale price, despite Tweeter not having a unit in stock at the time. It's also on my BestBuy card at 12-months interest-free; not that I'll need the time, but it's a nice bonus for an already sweet deal.

So why the blog post for this? Well, there's only one tiny problem: the Elite 92 is, according to the spec sheet, 7 3/8" tall and the opening in the TV stand Dad and I made is 7". I'm banking on being able to remove the receiver's feet and put on some low-profile plastic adhesive bumper feet instead. While the receiver should fit with this arrangement (I hope), it still leaves the issue of cooling to deal with.

The manual for the Elite 92 recommends 8" of ventilation on top of the receiver -- I'll be giving it 1/4" if I'm lucky. In an effort to keep the receiver cool, prolong its life, and not void the 2-year warranty (though I may've done just that with this post), I've opted to modify the TV stand slightly to provide better cooling. The plan consists of two 3.5" diameter holes which will accommodate fans sucking upward into the compartment above the receiver. This compartment houses the center channel speaker, which doesn't run all the way to the back of the TV stand, leaving room behind for the fans & ducting (as shown below).


The picture above shows the intended fan layout from a top-down perspective. It depicts the receiver size (on the shelf below), center channel size, and accurate dimensions for the fan placement & mounting holes. The black strips represent the supports for the TV stand's top (above the center speaker & fans), which can't be removed, thus the fans must be mounted between them (a 3d drawing would show this much more clearly, but it'd take me hours to draw that with my ancient CAD skills -- CADKEY on MSDOS anyone?). The schematic was drawn in Microsoft Visio (AKA: CAD for dummies).

Originally, I wanted to get some ultra-quiet high-flow fans for this project, but I've since abandoned that idea in favor of a couple of old 92mm PC fans I had lying around. They're complete with the plastic CPU ducting, so they should work perfect to suck the air up and expel it out of the back of the cabinet. The ducts have been painted flat black using Krylon "for plastic" spray paint as shown below:


The fans were wired in parallel to a COTS 12v AC/DC power supply, which will be powered from the receiver's switched AC outlet. This will turn the fans on/off with the receiver. The two fans draw about 500mA DC; here it is wired up on the bench:


Next, I'll be rearranging the living room and setting up the receiver when it comes in. After that, all that's left is to punch 2 giant holes in the TV stand and bolt it all up. Hopefully this will all get done this weekend!

------
For auditioning material, I picked up The Chronicles of Narnia and Behind Enemy Lines on Blu-ray. I also plan to pull out some favorite CDs from my collection to demo the system. These will undoubtedly include "Echoes: The Best of Pink Floyd, The Eagles - "Hell Freezes Over", and Tool - "Lateralus" -- which reminds me, I need to go buy Tool's "10,000 Days"!

I've been on a casual hunt for SACDs too as the PS3 can play them and they offer higher-quality audio than regular CDs, but the format seems to be nearing extinction. I guess I'll have to wait until Blu-ray audio discs become more popular (I know the NIN's "Ghosts" is available on Blu-ray audio disk as an exact bit-by-bit copy of the original 24bit/96kHz studio master recording, and while tempting, I'm not that into NIN to shell out the requisite $75 to obtain it).

Updates to come, check back for pictures and more details.

Wednesday, April 16, 2008

Mark Cuban - Thoughts on CEO Pay

I normally don't like reposting content from other blogs and websites because it really isn't contributing anything new to the internet. I am going to make an exception here, however, to direct all of you to the most recent posting from Mark Cuban on his personal blog. I've had his site linked in my favorites list on the right >>> for a while, but I've never taken the time to explain why I like him so much.

A lot of his content isn't really interesting to me - the posts about basketball, many of the posts about business strategy, etc..., but every once and a while he comes out with some stellar posts about motivation, achievement, and how to succeed in the business world (search his site for "Success and Motivation" to find these). These types of posts are where he really shines.

Anyway, his latest post, "My 2 Cents on CEO Pay", really struck a cord with me. In it, he outlines the disconnect between the pay for high-level management in a company and the lower-level employees and what's needed to close that gap:
No matter what you call it, every CEO hired, is asking for equity knowing that their only goal is to hit the jackpot and create a pool of wealth that puts them in the "fuck you" wealth category. Thats enough money to buy or rent just about anything you can think of and put you in position to never have to work again. You just live off the cash in the bank.
...
The problem with all of this is that there is a huge disconnect between the CEO and shareholders doing well and those who work for the company doing well.
...
Yes, its true that CEOs see the value of their holdings shrink. However, unlike lottery tickets whose value goes to zero when you dont hit the number, the CEO equity positions retain their upside and history has shown us that if they go far enough underwater, they will get repriced and /or reissued. All in the name of keeping the CEO happy. So while CEOs may get "less rich" for awhile, the game is stacked so that a downturn gets them happy real fast when the upturn comes.
...
The pressure from Wall Street is to grow earnings forever. Not matter what it takes. This isnt a problem when a company is doing well. EVeryone is happy. But when the economy hits a bump like it has now, when the market is hitting a bump and stock prices are declining, like it is now, the pressure comes. Everyone owning the stock reacts and whats to know what the CEO will do to get the price back up. This, as they say "is where the CEO earns their pay" Unfortunately, what this really means is that everyone who works for that company is at risk. At risk of losing their jobs, benefits, raises, you name it. Its at risk.

All of which is a long winded way of saying that employees live in the corporate cash zone, CEOs and the top few in management live in the equity/lottery ticket zone.

Those in the cash zone always take the first hit. People,places and things that consume cash are the first things to go because cash expenses immediately reduce earnings. If you or anyone like you consumes cash, unless someone upstairs thinks you generate a straight to the bottom line return on the cash expenditure, you are about to become a corporate ghost. Your person, place and thing will be memorialized as a cut to increase earnings mentioned in a press release that wall street will cheer and use to push up the stock price.
...
The only possible way to change this is to put CEOs in the cash zone. Make companies generate 100pct of their compensation in cash that is 100pct expensable in the quarter paid. Thats not to say they cant own stock. Hell yes they can own stock. But make them buy it either on the open market, or as part of the programs that make stock available to every company employee, on the same terms. They are getting paid enough in cash and if they believe in their ability to run the company, they can put their money where their mouth is. Eliminate all the free lottery tickets. Make them buy stock, options, warrants, whatever, on the same terms as everyone else can.
This seems like such a simple idea to me. Something that would put the interest of upper management more in line with the interests of the average employee. It would help level the playing field at large companies, making the management just as expendable as the regular employees. It's this logical, equitable, common-sense approach to business that I really like about Mark Cuban.